Prediction of Arthur Gea [315th] vs Jan Choinski [187th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W L W W W W
Form
W W L L W L W W L LH2H: Gea 0 - 1 Choinski
They have played 3 sets in total, with Gea winning 1 and Choinski winning 2. The last match between Gea and Choinski was at the Monza Challenger, 09-04-2025, Second, Clay with Jan Choinski getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Arthur Gea | 0 |
| Jan Choinski | 1 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Jan Choinski
Player
Arthur Gea
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 11 | Games Won | 16 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:11:58 | Average Match Time | 2:11:58 |
| 59% (49/83) | 1st Serve % | 71% (56/79) |
| 59% (29/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (37/56) |
| 44% (15/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 61% (14/23) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (5/11) |
| 35% (28/79) | Return Points Win % | 47% (39/83) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Arthur Gea vs Jan Choinski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gea 0 - 1 Choinski
Editorial Prediction:
As we delve into the statistical performance of Gea and Choinski over the past six months, one might wonder just how crucial a player's second serve could be in predicting the outcome of a match. Interestingly, both players have managed to secure 0% of points on their second serves. How does this influence the match predictions for this duel?
When examining return game statistics, Gea and Choinski each exhibit a similar pattern, claiming 0% of their opponent's second serve points. This consistent performance extends to their first serve returns as well, with both players accomplishing a 0% success rate. Such data is invaluable for determining which athlete might have an edge in this head-to-head contest. Could these identical stats suggest an evenly matched encounter?
Looking at how each contender handles pressure situations, breakpoints tell an intriguing story. Both Gea and Choinski have a 0% breakpoint saving rate, a compelling figure for those engaged in in-game betting. But what does this say about their resilience during pivotal moments?
Exploring each player's overall performance over the past year, Gea and Choinski have yet to register a win, reflected in their win-loss stats of 0/0. This parity might make it challenging to pick a favorite. Does this suggest a match defined by raw potential rather than past glory?
Considering the challenging nature of the opponents faced, neither Gea nor Choinski has detailed statistics on the average rank of their competitors in the last year. This gap leaves no room for analysis about their adaptation to various levels of competition; perhaps this match offers a clean slate to demonstrate their capabilities.
If this contest extends to a deciding set, both players hold a 0% winning rate in such scenarios over the past 12 months. For live result predictions and betting enthusiasts, this particular statistic could imply the match tilting into a true test of endurance and mental strength when pushed to the limits.
Finally, evaluating breakpoint conversion—often the linchpin in match swings—both Gea and Choinski have converted 0% of these crucial opportunities. Such a stat bears significant weight for those keen on making real-time betting decisions. Will one of these players seize the chance to shift momentum and claim this bout?
With these comprehensive insights, it seems neither Gea nor Choinski has decisive advantages based purely on recent form and statistics. The anticipation builds toward a closely contested match-up where perhaps the key to victory lies more in seizing emergent opportunities rather than banking on past performance. Hence, without distinctive prowess in either direction, predicting a champion becomes a fascinating endeavor, awaiting real-time revelations on the court.
Arthur Gea Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Giovanni Fonio
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
77%
(
37 of
48)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
52
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Andrea Picchione
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Manuel Mazza
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Leonardo Malgaroli
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Arthur Gea
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
84%
(
57 of
68)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Arthur Gea
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Arthur Gea
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Arthur Gea
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jan Choinski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Jan Choinski
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Jan Choinski
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Arthur Gea
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Jan Choinski
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
76%
(
62 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Jan Choinski
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
79%
(
53 of
67)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Jan Choinski
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Philip Henning
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (97/65) | Win/Loss | 59% (386/273) |
| 59% (212/150) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (868/658) |
| 53% (1768/1545) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7530/6696) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 337 | Aces Total | 1752 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 535 | Total Double Faults | 927 |
| 1:43:8 | Average Match Time | 1:20:7 |
| 381.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 477.07 |
| 61% (6504/10600) | 1st Serve % | 65% (24204/37035) |
| 67% (4339/6504) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (16390/24204) |
| 48% (1969/4096) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (6595/12831) |
| 47% (562/1184) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1658/3798) |
| 43% (4587/10583) | Return Points Win % | 40% (15050/37223) |
| 59% (93/157) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (374/639) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 45% (5/11) |
| 63% (20/32) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (96/182) |
| 48% (21/44) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (106/204) |
| 86% (101/87) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (369/326) |
| 14% (101/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (369/43) |
| 15% (60/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (289/59) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
